In law as in ethics, the right to informed consent remains the "bedrock" of the modern medicine. Two stories on hospital medical care last week show just how widespread is the violation of this basic right.
They both reported on the number one problem facing patients and their families: a failure to communicate. There can be no informed consent apart from a steady process of communication between "team" and patient.
In last Wednesday's Wall Street Journal, Laura Landro discussed the Press Ganey Associates health care satisfaction survey based on more than two millions patients at 1,576 hospitals. According to the survey, there remains a "communication disconnect" between providers and patients. Despite the prevalence of patient satisfaction surveys, hospitals have not responded well to the opportunities for improvement presented by patients and their families. Patients consistently report feeling "ill-informed" about treatments in the hospital.
The "communication disconnect" can have devastating consequences as reported in last Monday's USA Today by Liz Szabo. In "Patient, protect thyself," Ms. Szabo illustrated how miscommunication inevitably leads to medical error.
Gillian Trumbell suffered from a rare heart condition that sends her to the hospital once a month. Szabo tells the tale of how a hospital employee showed up in Gillian's room and announced he was taking her for dialysis. If not for her loud protestations, Gillian would have been treated for kidney failure.
It's a sad day for the process of informed consent when patients are placed in the position of having to scream to get the attention of providers. But, according to Szabo's excellent piece, this is precisely the advice given by leading authorities as a remedy to stem the tide of medical error. Said one, "It's your body!"
Recent Comments